Productive Cuddling

   646  
Productive Cuddling
I recently showed the opening of the film American Beauty to a bunch of French executives during an English Debate seminar entitled “The Ideal: French vs. American”.  This film’s is a beautiful, tight beginning, a sequence which opens us up to the characters and their worlds in a crisp and rhythmic way.  In it you have the protagonist played by Kevin Spacey, a character who even from the start resembles someone who has been run over, by his life, the speed of his culture, the breakneck but normative pace of his everyday.  Alongside him is his wife, marvelously played by Annette Benning, who might not even once stop running during the entire film.  She is like a relay runner, rabid and pumped to either hand off or collect her baton at any given moment.  She is at one with the speed of her life.  “Lester, could you make me a little later please?  Because I’m not quite late enough!”  This is the first line she throws at her husband in the film.   I pressed the pause button after and peered at the people in the room, many of whom were there (I won’t lie) not to practice their English but to take a healthy advantage of the fact that their company supplies for someone like me to waltz in and occupy them for a day; the American New York gay guy with impeccable English who will chew their ear off about films and ideals, thereby preventing them from doing any work.  How relaxing!  I asked them how this sequence might have been filmed, what actors, which setting, etc., if the film were to be called French Beauty.  And the response was generally what I expected – ze mother, perhaps, would be occupying herself with ze children?  Or at least maybe there would be a brief breakfast scene?  Fine.  But nowhere did I hear a change in how the Kevin Spacey character would be portrayed.  Which meant, in my mind, the fast characters would slow down and the slow characters would…stay as is.  That is not to say that the speed of life here, or at least the conception of the speed of life, is less dramatic, or lifelike.  It is just slower, more studied, with more stops along the way for one to take advantage of the moment.  Please don’t think I am anti-French: I am just trying to understand how people live around me.  By no means am I trying to infer that the French walk around like the depressed Lester Burnham, but instead that they might be moving abreast of him, at his pace.   Whether or not you agree, it is undeniable that the pace of life is different in Paris.  This feeling was amplified for me upon my recent return from New York, where I spent a whirlwind 2 weeks seeing family and friends, being taken out, eating, shopping and writing (I know, woe is me).  But somehow, in all this hurried enjoyment, my body remembered something absolutely vital: this is how we used to move! it said.  It was all play in New York, and I still managed to do more, see more, spend more and move more than when in France.  Granted, even though New York is my home, it has become an altogether strange vacation destination for me in the past two years (an incident that I am sure other supplanted people would relate to), a place where I am now unsure as to what extent I should be enjoying myself.  But the fact remains that France is where I live and work, and the only thing I manage to do more of here is eat and sleep!  Getting back from my trip a few weeks ago, I threw myself into breakneck charades just to go to the doctor or to run various other menial errands.  I mischievously waited until the last moment, maybe to give myself a jolt of physical nostalgia for the homeland.  I remember trying to picture New York in the Parisian snapshots that whizzed before me in my hurried state.   But that is where the rushing stops for me here.  There are in fact some amazing things I’ve adopted from the French organization of time and ambition, things that have even changed my life.  Barring the abovementioned adjustment period after New York, when I’m late, I no longer do it.  Rushing and me are over.  To ‘rush’ is an oxymoron, an activity which in itself is fated for failure.  I just got this.  If one rushes, one is almost always already late (unless you’re like my lovingly neurotic mother who rushes as if she is late in order to avoid being so).  What is the point?  It took the French feeling of laissez-faire – which does course through the air here – for me to finally realize, there is no point.  If I am late, now it’s bon, why rush?!  Even the French word bon implies a sort of settling, a damned-if-I’m-upset-about-it kind of throwing in of the towel, whereas ‘OK’ is a little less flexible, something we Americans use to move on with.  The good-natured anti-rush; I can’t tell you how much this has helped my mental and physical wellbeing, now that I no longer arrive at my destination sweaty and stressed (3 minutes later, calm and ready, is far more preferable).  I plod along with the others, defiantly, thinking to myself how much better I feel by not …
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • ALREADY SUBSCRIBED?
Previous Article Literary Rentrée Celebrates American Author Jake Lamar
Next Article Buzz: State-of-the-Art Cookery School